RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05525
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be corrected to reflect she served in support of Operation
DESERT SHIELD from Jan 91 to Apr 91.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was on temporary duty (TDY) in support of the Gulf War and her
service is not reflected on her DD Form 214.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former Air Force Reserve member who served on
active duty from 1 Feb 91 to 28 Apr 91.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or injustice. The applicant was on active duty for 87 days
from 1 Feb 91 to 28 Apr 91. Her points history does not support
the time period she alleges to have been on orders. Furthermore,
there is no evidence in her military personnel records to show she
served in support of a contingency operation. Per AFI 36-3202,
Separation Documents, Table 2, states in order to receive a DD
Form 214 a member must complete 90 days or more consecutive active
duty days or 1 day more if in support of a contingency operation.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 9 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
After careful consideration of applicants request and the
available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.
Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error
or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States
Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant
has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we
are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or
injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot
conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicants failure to file in a timely manner.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the
interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision
of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-05525 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Nov 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 22 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02419
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Air Force Good Conduct Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award - Air Force Longevity Service Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Air Force Training Ribbon The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00917
The applicants master personnel records reflect a DD Form 214, was issued for the period 22 Apr 91 and 10 Sep 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04575
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTT recommends denial of his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. DPTT states that although the applicant would have been otherwise eligible for the benefit per the Verification of Members Active Duty Service...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05007
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflective of his continuous honorable reserve service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03957
However, regulation requires the issuance of a DD Form 214 based on reserve personnel ordered to active duty for a contingency operation and for reserve personnel being separated from the Air Force after having served 90 days or more of active duty for training. However, NPRC previously provided a statement of service to the Navy in 1965 showing Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve service with periods of active duty for training but no active duty. While the applicant contends his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03552
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03552 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect her release from active duty as 8 Nov 05, instead of 4 Oct 05. On 4 Oct 05, the applicant was relieved from active duty and issued a narrative reason for...
AF | BCMR | CY1994 | BC 1994 02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1994-02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...